Twitter, the story of a logo not to believe. An evening fooling around on sites humor can be much more productive than a day's work. One day I will write an ode to cazzeggiano: it is easier to inhibit the creative schemes of work remaining on the drives, instead of leaving the doors open and filter as much as possible of what surrounds us.
It 'difficult for any of you know the Silk soy milk. I've never heard, but in the U.S. is a famous product. Today, the packaging of the product is different, but time nature and ecology is trying to convey was summarized in a stylized bird. Surprisingly ... identical to the logo of Twitter:
Coincidence? Boh, and this graphic that appeared in a shampoo
tea?
It is not over. Appears on the same branch houses a mini PC, the KPC's Shuttle PC:
The clues are becoming too many. And suspicion is gaining increasing ground: from stock photography?
The history of the Twitter logo is short and bastard. The designer, Simon Oxley, was paid just between 2 and $ 6 for his work, causing some controversy about the exploitation of work "crowdsourced" (or "made by the user community). In comparison, the Nike logo designer, Carolyn Davidson, was treated really well ($ 35).
But in the end, Oxley is not so bad. You simonox on iStockphoto.com, has 200 bird vector download of his
royalty-free, but its existence warns companies: when they learn not to trust too much about the stock images and begin to produce original material?
What Twitter has just done, replacing the bird. Sale
